Quixtar.com - Official Site of Quixtar Inc.
Teaching Entrepreneurialism
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
I was just reading an interesting Wall Street Journal column by George Anders about successful entrepreneurs. One trait he calls out is the confidence these individuals have. "Successful entrepreneurs believe they can make a lot of money, even when they don't. But can that confidence be taught?"

The column discusses some of the different ways parents encourage their children and how that might affect their confidence later in life. He points out that pure intelligence is not the best indicator of success, since many of his smartest classmates chose safe careers. Others, who may not have been the brightest, had confidence to spare and a fearlessness about trying different things.

We all know these people. I remember one individual who was probably a genius, yet lived at home with his parents working at local restaurants into his late 30s (at least) because he didn't have great social skills nor confidence. Meanwhile, some of the biggest success stories I know involve individuals who barely finished high school, let alone college. They made up for their lack in traditional training received in schools with confidence, drive, and connecting with others (even if that is something they had to learn).

As a parent, I do try to push my children to excel in their studies. I think it's a waste if they're not tapping into the latent gifts they have. That said, I also believe it's important to make sure they're well-socialized, spending time developing and enjoying their friendships. My wife and I praise their successes. We try to find out what they think might be at the root of their less-than-stellar performances. In the end, I do think it is our goal for them to know who they are, find what they like, and be confident pursuing that. With a junior in high school, that's a particularly challenging task right now.

Anders' examples focus on lessons learned in childhood. But can that confidence be taught to adults? Sometimes. I think one of the greatest aspects of the various systems related to the Quixtar business is that they can help build confidence. They are intended to teach skills, to provide encouragement and motivation, and to recognize successes along the way. Nobody disagrees with the importance of these aspects of the systems. Many people would not succeed in the Quixtar business if it were not for the teachings and encouragement received from other IBOs through the business systems.

These "Lines of Affiliation" -- training organizations -- become targets for many because income is earned for the teaching tools they provide, including books, recordings, and meetings. That's just free enterprise. Should there be even more disclosure about that income? Possibly. I hear again and again from IBOs (not leaders), however, that they're completely aware that Diamonds and other IBO leaders earn substantial income from their training efforts. It's only fair, they say, that a Diamond who travels to talk to other IBOs on a weekly basis be compensated for sharing their experiences. These Diamonds don't necessarily benefit from the business growth they help generate through their speaking engagements, since they're often speaking (live or through recordings) to people who aren't even in their personal line of sponsorship.

Critics point out that the lifestyles often portrayed in IBOs' promotional materials aren't exclusively the result of those IBOs' Quixtar businesses, since they also earned system income. Well, it's a chicken/egg question, isn't it? They had to be successful at Quixtar before they could ever earn anything as a speaker. Nobody would pay to hear from the guy who didn't achieve in their business. IBO leaders will insist that "the business" is broader than what's encompassed in the Quixtar Independent Business Owners Compensation Plan alone. The business includes what the system can provide as well. Nobody can deny that this has indeed been their experience and could be that of others as well.

Quixtar's efforts are to bring greater clarity and consistency to this experience. We also hope to better inform the teachings about how to build a successful, profitable business, helping more IBOs earn more income earlier on through a balanced business approach that includes more retail sales to customers. Building a business organization is an important aspect of growth for an IBO, but doesn't necessarily generate a lot of income in the early stages of their business. Retail sales can help provide income for today that keeps newer IBOs around longer to enjoy the fruits of their business-building efforts later. Improved retention (based on those earlier successes), meanwhile, helps ALL IBOs in a line of sponsorship.

Rich DeVos talked at Achievers about confidence. For many people, they don't come into the business with an abundance of confidence (or social skills, for that matter). Early successes making a few retail sales help build the confidence of IBOs as they prepare for greater successes down the road. Rich talked about the sense of accomplishment an IBO feels making their first sale, and then another ... and then finding two more customers.  Approaching potential customers, identifying needs in their life, and fulfilling those needs with product can provide great experience at working with individuals. As customers come to enjoy products, they also may become interested in the business opportunity as well.



Category: ,


Comments

Ty said:
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 #

Fine and dandy if the purpose of the training was to teach new IBO's how to build a profitable business.

A couple of points...

1. The training may have started out as a way to teach the newest IBO how to build the business, but somewhere along the line, the training system became geared towards creating profit for the high level IBO's associated with the training.

2. If the training really worked (2-5 year plan) it would be worth more than they are charging today.

The basics of the training systems haven't changed in 20 years. They don't adopt new technology because they fear that the new technology will cut tools profits, even though it is painfully obvious that the technology would help the newest IBO.

Tex said:
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 #

Kia,

Good post.

.

There is value in the systems teaching confidence and many other topics useful both in and out of the Q business.

.

However, there is also an issue referred to as honesty.

.

When a Diamond has a large house on the Florida Intercoastal Waterway, a large 45' motorcoach, an ocean going speed boat, a restored and "tricked up" 1932 Pontiac automobile, a twin engine airplane, a Corvette, etc., and only AFTER he gets kicked out of Q over a tool related lawsuit reveals he made 2/3 of his $350,000/year income from tools and never requalified as a Diamond after the first couple of years, yet CLEARLY implied his income was from Q while in the business, this is a problem.

.

And I don't believe his income situation was unusual. In fact, many Platinums and above do not requalify at their pin level, making the tool income even more of a significant transparency issue, especially for Emeralds and above.

Jeffrey said:
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 #

I think it's time to drop the sarcasm. Just because I'm not a Diamond doesn't mean I'm not a leader and just because my Diamond earned the pin (about 20 years ago) doesn't mean that he is a leader. I guess nothing is going to change. I'm done blogging. It's pointless.

Tex said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Here's a definition: Entrepreneur - a person who organizes and manages any enterprise, esp. a business, usually with considerable initiative and risk.

.

Although elements of entrepreneuralism are used in the Q business by IBO's, I would consider an IBO more of an independent business owner (IBO) who uses a private franchise model and applies systems to grow their business. The IBO is much closer to that of a McDonalds owner, without the high initial cost and associated risk.  

.

Regarding confidence, or any other number of skills developed by the systems, this is needed whether one is an entrepreneur or any other number of occupations/professions.

Kia said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

In response to Ty, Tex and Jeff, let me just say that I agree (and most would) with your key points in these responses.

.

Ty, I agree that training should change over time to be current and relevant and help IBOs successfully build a Quixtar business.

.

Tex, I agree that honesty is central to any person relying upon their communication skills as a source of income. If you're proven to be dishonest, you've lost all credibility with your audience.

.

Jeffrey, I agree that you don't need to be a pin to be a leader, nor are all Diamond pins in our business effective leaders. I think John Maxwell would heartily agree that you can demonstrate leadership from wherever you are in an organization. At least that's what 360 Leader is all about.

.

And finally, Tex again, I agree that IBOs don't necessarily demonstrate entrepreneurialism through bringing a new idea to the marketplace, but they definitely (to be successful) must demonstrate the "with considerable initiative" aspect of the entrepreneur definition.

.

What I would love to see is more entrepreneurial innovation applied to our business by younger risk-takers who feel like they have a better way to do this business. For some, the tried-and-true practices will still be the ones they pursue; for others they need to try new approaches that maybe don't fit within a current system. As an Independent business owner, that's truly their call to make!

Sharon said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Jeffrey, you stayed with your Amway/Quixtar business for many years; don't give up on the Opportunity Zone so quickly. I felt some dismay when I read Kia's post also.

Kia, your post was excellant, except you may not be aware of the tendency of the LOAs to push their "educational" programs and materials and the recruitment of new IBOs to consume more "educational" materials rather than teaching product knowledge and marketing skills to sell those products.

Sharon

ibofightback said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Ty, you say "The basics of the training systems haven't changed in 20 years."

The "basics" of the systems are make a list, invite, show business/products. That's the basics of ALL businesses and aren't going to change.

You then say "They don't adopt new technology because they fear that the new technology will cut tools profits"

Sorry, but that's BS. In the time I've been involved I've seen tapes->CDs->MP3s. I've seen development of training via streaming video websites. I've seen actual building strategies change dramatically at least 3 times. I've seen development of prospecting tools and DVDs that never existed even 5 years ago. etc etc etc And that's just what runs of the top of my head now. To claim "no change" is like claiming that telephones haven't changed since Edison because you still need to talk into a microphone.

Tex - As we have discussed before, I entirely agree regarding "deceit". Those kind of so-called "leaders" need to run out of the business.

As for claiming it doesn't work because not everyone qualifies diamond in 2-5 years, that's just absurd. A decent training system doesn't impose time limits or goals, it helps you set your own. Many people have qualified Diamond in less than 5 years. Many people have qualified platinum in 5 years. Because that's the goal they set and the effort they put in to it. Quite frankly I'm sick of critics and competitors claim that people "failed" when they reached their goals in their time frame with their effort and a happy with their success. Neither you nor I get to decide whether they failed or not. Only they do.

Gene said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Kia:

I really don’t mind spending the time reading the Blogs, but don’t like constantly posting on them- so many things to do in life, kids, home life, work, and of course building our business.  I feel compelled to put in something here and there, because it seems most of the blogs are from people complaining about the "way things are done"  I would guess these people are in similar, if not the same LOS's, and the mantra against tools is due to their experience.  I personally find great value in our LOS tools, and would hate to have Q move to eliminate them due to the complaints by the vocal few.  In any endeavor in life, there are the few who make it, and in the large majority who don’t, there will be a few who spend all of their efforts and energy trying to figure out how to make it better, without actually going out and trying to do it first.  I totally understand that under the umbrella of Quixtar, that there can be abuses- we deal with people, and people are the same everywhere, some good, some bad, many drifting through the gray areas of existence, never really making any mark.  As I build my business, I see this more and more, and it really is sad, but the vast majority will not put out any effort or energy to better their life, but want "someone" else to "do something", and complain when nothing gets done.  How dumbfounding!  I was talking to my Diamond about why there are complaints about tools on the Net, and also why many people don’t do anything with their business.  He brought up a couple of good points to me, If the "big guys" want to build a recording studio, hire a staff to techs to run equipment, etc, let them make money on the tools they produce.  Wow!  Imagine that! free enterprise means that the market determines the success of the product, and if the product has no value it will be gone.  I have IBO's in our group who get on the BDS tools, and keep them, even though they are not doing anything to build the business (?)  and others, who get on them, get off them a month or two later, and then back on a few months later.  Others never get on them again.  Obviously, the person who never gets on them finds no value, while the person using them and not building a business may find other value, and in some cases are soaring in their regular jobs due to the growth they are experiencing from those tools.  

Secondly, as He and I were talking, he pointed out the pins that have quit, gone inactive, or lost their businesses over the years.  This business requires you to have a heart for people and a willingness to serve.  Anyone who achieves any significant level of success in a people oriented business must develop those traits, and those that do not, and are after the money they can make off of people, do not succeed.  There may be a few here and there, but they are the shooting stars, and burn out quickly, as we have seen in this business a few times!  

The majority of the population has the lotto mentality, and wants success quickly.  As we see over and over, those that achieve that via a large lotto, inheritance, or other quick money, destroy themselves quickly.  In this business, we have the ability to achieve unusual financial and relational significance in our lives.  To do so without destroying our selves and family, we have to become more than we are now, and this is the core value of the tools available through our business.  I love that you referenced Maxwell’s book, as we have received several of them on our BDS subscription.  Obviously he has something of value in to the marketplace, and we find it useful in building our businesses.  Who should determine the "value" of the tools?  Again, the majority would say "someone else".  America is a land of opportunity, but we need to also learn personal responsibility.  So again, who should determine the value of the tools?  The very nature of free enterprise says "the IBO".

Kia said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Thanks for your comments Sharon and IBOFB. I'm happy to hear about the progression made in systems to keep up with the times. You are also right, IBOFB, that there are some disciplines of selling that just don't change over time. The key point Anders was making in his column was that successful entrepreneurs typically have strong self confidence. That's not just true today; that's always been true.

Sharon, forgive me if I sounded unaware of criticisms of systems. I am aware and do not favor marketing educational materials that are either not educational or not effective. Nor would I encourage IBOs to buy them if they weren't. Unfortunately, I already tend to write long posts and if I share everything I think on every topic I write about, I'd never get out of here!  Thanks for your feedback.

Kia said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Gene, thanks for your comments. I know there are lots of people who read these posts but have little time to comment themselves.  I appreciate when you feel strongly about something that you do post.

The point of my post in the first place was to talk about the essential value of tools in the business. I believe there is a real value. I also agree that not everything will be valuable for everyone, and that some things are of no value to most everyone. And, as you stated, free market rules should (and do) apply to the systems.

Tex said:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 #

Jeffrey,

.

As Sharon said, hang in there and keep blogging. We need as many voices of reason as we can get. The problem won't be fixed overnight, but we need to keep up the visibility to get anywhere.

.

Sharon,

.

You hit the nail right on the head.

.

ibofb,

.

What hasn't changed in the past few decades is the level of profit made from the tools compared to the A/Q business, even though the rest of the world now communicates for FAR less than it could 2-3 decades ago. If I am wrong, just post the tool profits here and I will be happy.

.

Kia/Gene,

.

No doubt in my mind there is value in the tools, but the "captive" customers (IBO's) Sharon refers to above and the tail (tool profits) wagging the dog (A/Q profits) is the central issue.

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(required - not displayed)